The final rule is that a donor’s ideal to reward is unrestricted. As established in the case of Ranee Khajoorunissa vs. Mst. Roushan Jahan (1876), the Privy Council recognised that a donor may perhaps present all or any percentage of their property, regardless of whether it adversely impacts the expectant https://jaredzdkbx.blog-kids.com/31311059/illegal-encroachments-lawyer-in-karachi-secrets